Christmas is filled with traditions. We're all familiar with the regular traditions, but there are lesser known ones such as the viewing of National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation with Chevy Chase. I love the squirrel scene:
There are other Christmas traditions as well. I don't experience this every year, but there is the tradition of one or more people my parents' age (not my parents, that's a different story) asking if I have a girlfriend. I love how telling them I don't have a girlfriend. It makes them squirm because they can't deal with the idea of a MGHOW instead of following the standard life script (tm). (Plus, I'm not going to tell them about how I had two girlfriends at the same time.) Women my parents age are especially mortified at the idea that I'm single because it means no woman is able to sink her claws into my money (and they have no idea what the real extent of my assets are). Why shouldn't they be pissed at the fact that I'm living in paradise?
Since I travel to my original undisclosed location for Christmas, there is also the tradition of seeing (or hearing about) friends and acquaintances I wouldn't see/hear about otherwise. Sometimes that leads to finding out about a story like which I'm going to tell you about.
I heard about someone I really don't know that well. This guy is around 10 years younger than me give or take so we were never friends or anything like that. He's in college now, and I heard about his girlfriend that his parents don't like. And with good reason because she's a bitch. I also figured out that's this girl is a big time feminist. She is majoring in womens' studies. I'm not kidding. She plans on going into some type of social work. In other words, she will be in some sort of feminist bureaucracy and be a feminist problem generator. Of course, she doesn't know how to cook either. This guy is (or at least was) really into her. He did everything for her from cooking to cleaning to whatever. She never reciprocated obviously. Her behavior was so odious that his (somewhat leftist) parents noticed. Of course, they didn't make the connection between her behavior and feminism.
This guy was actually thinking he was going to have a future with this girl. Fortunately, it sounds like his dad convinced him out of it. However, that was only due to his dad making him realize just how much things would suck with this girl since she wouldn't be able to contribute to a marriage/household financially (which is a big deal since a job in his current major doesn't pay a large salary) and wouldn't be willing to contribute non-financially. (Remember that knowing basic life skills like cooking are oppressive to women.) That probably solved the problem of the current girlfriend, but it doesn't solve anything longer term since he probably will end up with another woman that's just as bad. Of course, his parents aren't telling him the truth about women which isn't surprising since I'm certain that they don't know the truth about women either. (I really don't know the guy well enough to get involved in any way.)
It's just another example of a guy overvaluing a vagina.
I called you a dick because you called me a shitty mother.
I don't know if you are a shitty mother in general. I will assume you are not without evidence to the contrary. However, you are a shitty mother when it comes to teaching your son about male-female interaction. Nearly all mothers are shitty when it comes to telling their sons about the reality of women (and that includes my mother too) so you are hardly unique.
This is really just one aspect of the problem of female solipsism.
I also noticed you avoided talking about your comment about how I'm only capable of relating to women as "cum dumpsters". If I only relate to women as "cum dumpsters" as you say, Susan, then I was only able to do anything with women by relating to them only as "cum dumpsters".
ED is a real problem among young men and it is growing.
Then quit whining when men take this problem seriously and go see a doctor about it.
As I stated on my blog, when one watches a lot of porn, those arousal patterns become entrenched in the brain. When men or women then find themselves in regular, normal, non-porn scenarios, they find that arousal eludes them.
I'm not sure what "a lot" of porn is, but if this is the case why didn't I have this problem when I lost my virginity recently? I don't know if I watched "a lot" of porn or not. Regardless, I wasn't doing any "porn scenarios" with either woman I was with.
Besides what is the definition of "porn" here? A quick search of the internet can find all different types of porn, many of which have some type of normal looking (i.e. not David Alexander bait) women.
Men aged 18-25 represent the fastest-growing group being prescribed Viagra
Is this because they actually need viagra or because because we're pill happy in the US? Given that this is the same age group with the biggest problem of heavy drinking and binge drinking it stands to reason that is a bigger part of the problem rather that "real ED". It's not even like they have to stop drinking, but it's easier to push a pill.
The reason I stated that men should stop wasting doctor's time is that they are frequently loathe to admit how much porn they watch
It rarely matters so its irrelevant. Besides what are these guys supposed to do if they aren't getting laid? They're horny, and they need to do something about it. Porn ends up being the answer unless they discover game.
Hurling the "shaming language" accusation won't cut it
There's a reason the catalog of anti-male shaming tactics exists. It's because we hear the same things over and over again from women on these issues. Susan, you almost could have copied and pasted some of the things you said from that list.
I'm also not sure why you keep denigrating my education - I never sought to use my degree in any other way than to explain on my own blog that I refer to my business background in the way I solve relationship problems. It's you in the Game community who keep calling attention to my Wharton MBA. In insisting that I earned it only through affirmative action, what do you hope to accomplish? Why would you even say that? How do you know?
First, you brought up your degree and made a claim that it's relevant. Thus it brings up the question if you actually earned your degree. Since affirmative action means lower standards for women and non-Asian minorities (as well as kicking out a deserving applicant using the guns of the state), this is a real question. At the time you attended Wharton there were hardly any women going after MBAs but an affirmative action program which means they were desperate for women. Thus any woman could have gotten in and gotten an MBA from them. I have no idea what your transcript was at Wharton, but anyone who could have benefited from affirmative action is suspect of having not met the actual standard of earning whatever they claimed to earn. Because of affirmative action, there is a good chance you never actually met the standard to earn a Wharton MBA particularly given the gender ratio of the Wharton MBA program at the time you attended. Thus your MBA is suspect at best and any talk about your "business background" is also suspect at best since you may have benefited from affirmative action there as well.
I do want men to be healthy. I want them to be fit for relationships, because that is what my own readers are looking for.
And here it comes. An anon covered this as well. If you look up female supremacism in the dictionary, this excerpt will be there as an example. Here we have a primary example of how women believe that men are supposed to be slaves for women. Susan is saying that men are only supposed to be healthy because women want it.
I'm much harder on the women than the men
Given that so heavily skewed pro-female now, you would have to be about ten thousand times harder on women than you are now for that to be meaningful.
What is the real female problem with porn? MarkyMark has already pointed that out: It exposes the slut lifestyle. Many women are afraid about the truth about women getting out whether its due to porn or game or something else. After understanding the truth about women, men will start going their own way (whether its using game to get laid occasionally, ghosting, etc. does not matter) and not be under the thumb of a woman.
All this talk about the problems supposedly caused by porn remind me of all the people who talk about the problems supposedly caused by video games. When it comes to video games, it was all shown to be bunk, and it will be the same with porn. What both of these have in common is that men (and boys in the case of video games) enjoy them. This is nothing more than another attack on a predominantly male activity. It's also safe to say that there is some fear of male sexuality on the part of women here.
Another thing going on is that women are afraid of the competition from porn. Of course, in the future with virtual reality sex and later sex bots, this "problem" will only get worse for women. That's what happens in an economic bubble when women keep raising the price of sex and offering less and less.
Oh boy, is there ever a population of bitter and angry males! I hate to even refer one person to it, but take a look at Roissy in DC. It's a blog about Game, mens' rights, and hatred of feminism and women in general. He gets hundreds of comments on every post, and he's spawned many blogs among his followers. It's scary stuff.
Let's count the types of shaming language in this paragraph. There's code red (bitter and angry), code orange (scary), and code black (hatred of women in general). There's also a possible code brown in that Roissy's blog is popular and Susan Walsh alludes to this meaning that there is horde of roissyite men ready to oppress women when the time is right. There's a reason why the catalog of anti-male shaming language exists. Susan Walsh has said nothing new. We have seen this a billion times before with practically the exact same wording proving that Susan Walsh and others like her are full of crap.
This is semi-OT, but in the associated post, Susan Walsh makes the absurd claim that porn is causing erectile dysfunction in guys in college. It's not like there would be a more reasonable cause such as binge drinking or heavy drinking in general. Personally, as someone who has looked a porn a fair amount, I had no trouble when it came to sex with Kristen and Rachel so I'm certain drinking (and drugs in some cases) is too blame not porn. That doesn't fit Susan Walsh's attack on men.
We need to add a color to the catalog of anti-male shaming tactics for watching/looking at porn.
On top of that Susan Walsh complains about college men going to doctors about ED. Apparently, she doesn't want men taking care of their health saying, "Stop wasting doctors’ time when they’re trying to deal with swine flu!". As we all know there's a massive swine flu epidemic going on...guess not. It's really just a veiled way of saying that men aren't important enough to actually go see the doctor unless he's slaving away for a woman. Also, what is Susan Walsh's motivation for taking away the only sexual outlet for many men not getting any? I am forced to conclude that she is protecting the pussy cartel. Susan Walsh's head will probably explode when virtual reality sex and later sexbots arrive on the scene. Her affirmative action MBA has not prepared her for the introduction of such technologies.
Now, if you will excuse me, I'm out to relate to women as only "cum dumpsters".
There's a song that starts out with, "If you're going to San Francisco, be sure to wear some flowers in your hair." I would like to see a Jersey Shore version that would have the lyric, "If you're going to the Jersey Shore, be sure to wear a hazmat suit." If you have been hanging around this part of the internet, you are probably already familiar with MTV's new Jersey Shore reality TV series (which you can watch online from that link) since it has been covered by both MarkyMark and FB. It's about four "guidos" and four three "guidettes" living in a house for the summer in Seaside Heights, NJ on the New Jersey coast. I feel like I should wear a hazmat suit when I watch it since I'm worried that some STD or chemicals will come through the TV. Currently, I just hold on to my zucchini for dear life while watching it since I'm worried it will fall off since I'm not wearing a hazmat suit.
All the guidos and guidettes are total jerk offs. They have moronic nicknames like "the situation", "j-woww" (yes that many w's), and "jolie" (because her name is Angelina). They are all orange because they spend massive amounts of time in tanning booths to get skin cancer. One of them actually owns a tanning booth. Nicole (whose nickname is "Snooki" which keeps getting messed up by the other housemates as snickers, etc.) got drunk and made a total ass of herself on the first day. She then goes though this whole drama about whether she should leave or not and decides to stay.
On the other hand Angelina did leave after a week. She started out using garbage bags to bring her stuff into the house instead of suitcases. Throughout the week she was there she cockblocks the guys and calls all the chicks they bring back skanks and whores. They were skanks and whores, but how were they any different than Angelina? She also refers to herself as the "Kim Kardashian of Staten Island". As part of staying in the house, all of the housemates have to work for their landlord at his t-shirt shop. Angelina has trouble with this and complains about having to work eight hours a day like everyone else and the job in general. She has a job working a bartender once a week where she does "great things". (Her quote.) She then breaks up with her boyfriend (who we later found out was married) and tries to fake being sick to not work at the t-shirt shop. After being a jack ass, the boss/landlord decides to fire her which means she can't be on the show. "The situation" was also claiming that he and Angelina had hooked up sometime before the show was filmed. Angelina kept denying this to the point where "the situation" said that he met Angelina's mother. On the after show for episode 3 (you have to make sure to watch all the after shows, bonus clips, etc.), she finally admits that they hooked up.
There's Pauly (nickname is DJ Pauly D) who we find out has a pierced dick. What more can I say than that?
There's also Mike who goes by "the situation". He calls himself that because of his 6 pack which he says is a "situation" for women. He tries to go after Sammi, one of the other housemates, which works for the first day or so, but she decides she's interested in Ronnie, another housemate, instead. "The situation" can't handle that and doesn't have any game for dealing with such a conundrum.
We see Mike and Pauly pick up a lot of chicks and bring them back to the house. Of course, there the kind of chicks you would not want to be near without a hazmat suit. A few of the other housmates say pretty much the same thing. They even run into a situation where they have two sets of girls and they are trying to manage the situation. (Unlike certain people they have no experience managing multiple women.) All of the housemates are walking petri dishes of STDs, but Mike and Pauly take it to a new level. These two guys should call themselves "the garbage men" because that's the type of women they go after. They would think they're superior to someone like myself who lost their virginity at 31, but they're full of crap. Kristen and Rachel are so far superior to the parade of skanky sluts that they were with.
There's also Vinny who doesn't seem to get a lot of airtime. If you watch the video at the last link, they talk about how he has standards which doesn't make for good TV. Of course, he's in Seaside Heights, NJ, how high are his standards really? We do see him get pinkeye. Also, in the first episode he had these massive stains in the armpits of the shirt he was wearing. This was when he was talking about what happened. In other words why didn't anyone say that this should be refilmed and have him change his shirt?
To add to all that, watch this youtube video:
I have barely scratched the surface of all of the BS these people said and did. You have to watch it. I haven't even included things like when they put charcoal into a gas grill and nearly burnt down the house. (There's also the infamous clip of Nicole getting punched out, but I waiting to talk about that for several reasons.)
If you don't believe that this show has any basis in reality, watch this youtube video:
I'm thinking next summer of taking a small trip to the Jersey Shore to see the reality of the guido/guidette. I will be doing so wearing a hazmat suit. Who knows what diseases I could encounter there? While I would be avoiding sex like the plague while there, I do have to worry about STDs mutating into something airbone because of the filthy and disgusting nature of the place. Also, I am certain the place is at the top of the list of the EPA's superfund sites. For that matter it's probably a superduperfund site since the place is clearly so polluted. It's not just the diseases. It's the chemicals too. Guidos use so much hair gel, body sprays, etc. that there is no way that place isn't filled with chemical pollution especially since it takes them 20 minutes to do their hair. It's like the whole area is skanky not just the men and the women.
If you decide to visit the Jersey Shore next summer, I might be there at the same time. I will be easily identified because I will be the one wearing the hazmat suit. Stop by and say hi.
This Spearhead article should be up sometime today. As with all my Spearhead articles comment at The Spearhead.
By now you have already heard about the "mancession", and you know that men are disproportionately losing their jobs compared to women in this recession. Since the official unemployment rate in the US is already in the double digits, President Obama did the only thing he knows how to do, talk, by holding a jobs summit. All that came out of the jobs summit was undeniable proof that all the attendees at the summit should probably be unemployed.
Originally, the "stimulus" (which was supposed to keep the official unemployment rate well below its current level) was supposed to be spent on infrastructure. The I-35W Mississippi River Bridge collapse in Minnesota in 2007 and the DC Metro crash earlier this year in June (which was also covered by our own Roissy on his personal blog) showed that spending on maintaining current and building new infrastructure has been insufficient for a long time. The stimulus would have been a good opportunity to begin to correct this massive error as solid infrastructure is necessary for long term economic growth (not to mention safety), but womens' (such as NOW) groups objected. They called the original stimulus "burly", "macho", and "sexist" demanding that the stimulus be spent on women. This was despite the fact that millions of men were losing their jobs, and education and health care added jobs primarily benefiting women. NOW and the other womens' groups were successful with the stimulus was skewed towards education and health care leaving infrastructure in the same dangerous state it was before. In addition the gap between male and female unemployment is the largest in the history of unemployment data going back to 1948 when such data began.
This "women oriented stimulus" along with other things has caused the federal deficit for this year to surpass 1.8 trillion dollars, far beyond the deficit of any previous year. This causes more men to be unemployed since this massive federal debt is sucking capital out of the private sector which destroys jobs. Literally, there is no capital for new business creation and business expansion that would create jobs. Given all of the other factors here, effectively the stimulus and other ballooning government spending is causing millions and millions of more men to be unemployed. At least if the stimulus was spent on infrastructure jobs doing badly needed work would be created that would have provided a solid foundation for long term economic growth. Instead we have infrastructure that continues to crumble plus more and more men losing their jobs.
Since government policy is now driving the problems of male unemployment and crumbling infrastructure, only a significant change in government policy will solve these problems. Until then millions more men will become unemployed and there will be more bridges collapsing, metro crashes, electrical grid failures, and other disasters that should never have happened.
I know there are something like 18 women claiming to be Tiger Woods's mistresses. (Ironically, there are 18 holes in golf.) In reality he probably only had 2 or 3. This makes him more comparable to what I have been doing by having two girlfriends at the same time. (Tiger maybe had six mistresses or maybe 5 if his wife counts adding up to six. You can figure out the really bad joke from that.)
When I started this experiment I assumed that I needed to keep my options open. I never thought I would be at the point where I would effectively have two girlfriends. I was thinking that it was going to take a lot more work for me to find even one woman to have sex with me. As a result at every step I didn't pick one. Even when things got to this point I couldn't give one up even though I knew I had to do it.
I hated what I was doing. From a practical perspective, it was a headache managing two women like that. It took up so much time. I had to remember not to say the other's name when with either one of them. Beyond that I hated what I become from a moral/ethical perspective too. I knew I had to do something about this, but I kept finding ways to not do it.
Well, I finally did it. Since I couldn't pick one, I picked none. I ended it with both of them. Needless to say it wasn't fun. I really don't want to go into details, but I did manage to avoid "running over myself with my own car".
It's all over with Kristen and Rachel. I'm not going to end the experiment yet, but I am going to take a break from it for two months. In other words I want to get past Christmas, New Years, and Valentines Day before I try again. I have learned some lessons from this which will help me the next time. Next time I want to see if I can do a bit better. Kristen and Rachel weren't bad by any means. Considering how bad lots of women are (just watch that Jersey Shore series on MTV for some proof) I was doing pretty good even with them. Regardless, I want to see if I can do better. That should also help with falling into another situation where I'm nailing two women.
First is Susan Walsh who you might know from Hooking Up Smart. She called me a dick (which has become a reoccurring theme), and said that I'm incapable of relating to women as more than "cum dumpsters". This had me laughing. You guys have read my posts on this. You can determine for yourself if I only relate to women as "cum dumpsters". What's really funny about what Susan Walsh said is that if she's correct, then the reason why I have been able to get women now is because I only relate to women as "cum dumpsters" now. I suspect this isn't what Susan Walsh wanted to say.
Second is a piece of hate email from "Catherine". Read it below:
You deserve an award for douchebag goodness. You are the biggest douchebag ever. You ain't going to get me on me saying you have a small penis. I know your penis isn't small. I know you're tall & good looking & very smart & very well endowed. I once had a boyfriend exactly like you that was all of that. He was so well endowed like 10 inches endowed. He screwed me with his giant endowment hurting me. I can see you so clearly. You love hurting women during sex. You guys promote large penis propaganda. I thought the pain was pleasure until a lesbian told me the truth.
With your large penis lies you will always have a stream of cum dumpster servant girls. Feminists like me are going to stop you well endowed guys pleasure-pain rape of women. Real men date feminists.
I really enjoyed reading this piece of hate email. It deserves an award for creativity. It's easy to tell me I have a small zucchini. It's harder to turn having a large zucchini into an insult but "Catherine" did. For all of my haters out there, this is the new gold standard you must aspire to.
I deserve an award for "douchebag goodness"??? Clearly "Catherine" has never seen any of that new Jersey Shore series. There's no way I can be more of a douchebag than any guido or guidette. I never given myself a nickname ever much less one like "the situation". (Yes, that's an actual nickname that one of the guidos gave himself.)
Not only am I a "charter member" of the Illuminati and a reptile alien, I'm also part of some sort of conspiracy of men with large zucchinis. This is a conspiracy so successful that we all "pleasure-pain rape" women with our large dicks, and they believe they like it. I don't know if this is the strangest thing I have ever heard, but its close. That reminds me. I have a meeting of the large dick conspiracy this weekend where we will once again measure our large dicks and discuss new ways to "pleasure-pain rape" women.
And "cum dumpster servant girls"??? Why are the terms "cum dumpster" and "douchebag" coming up this much? Both of those are terms Susan Walsh uses plenty. I doubt she wrote the hate email from "Catherine" because why would she, but it does seem like an odd coincidence.
If you will excuse me, I'm seeing my "cum dumpster servant girls" soon, and I want to get ready to "pleasure-pain rape" them with my 10 inch zucchini and make them think they like it.
What happened to Tiger Woods isn't being taken seriously by most of our society. This is no surprise. One example of this was a skit from the most recent episode of Saturday Night Live. (The skit can be viewed on Hulu, which may not work if you are outside the US, or on Youtube.) The only reaction to this video has been how it was in "poor taste" because Rhianna was the musical guest for that episode. However, the sketch itself is very interesting for what it tells us about the societal view of female on male domestic violence. In the skit Elin is set off by very small things such as Tiger Woods's cell phone ringing. Plus, we are supposed to accept explanations for what is happening to Tiger Woods that are more and more impossible such as Tiger Woods falling down a flight of stairs and throwing himself through a window to Tiger Woods driving a car that he ran himself over with, etc. There is also a throwaway line about not blaming Cadillac for what happened with the car. Since female on male domestic violence isn't taken seriously someone else has to be blamed no matter how absurd, Tiger Woods, General Motors, etc. Throughout the skit Tiger Woods makes comments about how strong Elin is because she must be for any type of domestic violence to happen supposedly. This is not the case. One reason that domestic violence against men is not taken seriously is that men on average are stronger than women. This has many problems. The most obvious is men being afraid to defend themselves against women because since they will be thrown in prison regardless of the actual circumstances. The advantage of strength can be nullified. One quick way of doing that is to pull out a gun. No matter how strong a man is, he isn't going to stop a bullet. Knowledge of martial arts is another way. Recently, there was the story of a "Mr. Zhang" in China who was constantly battered by his wife. She battered "Mr. Zhang" using Kung Fu, the martial art that she had practiced since she was a child. Domestic violence against men isn't taken seriously in China either. "Mr. Zhang" was only able to get a contract stating that his wife would only batter him once a week. This contract was enforced by his in laws. Such a thing is absurd (but what can be expected from a woman who says that "she can't help herself") and shouldn't be necessary. I'm not familiar with the Chinese legal code, but I'm certain assault and battery is illegal in China. Thus, this proves that domestic violence against men is treated in a similar way there as it is in the West. Another good example is Carolyn Brown of Louisiana who poured boiling grits on her boyfriend while he was sleeping. As he was asleep his strength advantage was nullified. There are other examples too such as Lorena Bobbit's attack on her husband. All the men I have talked about so far have one thing in common. They are still alive. Phil Hartman wasn't so lucky. You may remember Phil Hartman from TV shows such as Saturday Night Live and Newsradio and movies such as Three Amigos. Hartman had many problems from the behavior of his third wife, Brynn. She had been addicted to drugs and in and out of rehab several times. Brynn was known for having trouble controlling her anger and losing her temper to gain attention. This came to a head in 1998 when Brynn, intoxicated and having recently taken cocaine, committed an act of domestic violence murdering Phil Hartman. With all of these problems why didn't Phil Hartman leave? Only Phil Hartman knows that, but some possibilities are that despite the fact that Brynn had major substance abuse problems a divorce court would have sided with her in distribution of assets. Even if that was the case, wouldn't that have been worth it for Phil Hartman? He would recover. Probably, except that they had two children. Given that women typically receive custody of children in divorce unless they're eating the children, the children would have been stuck with Brynn and all of her problems. Phil Hartman wouldn't have been there to protect his children. I would not be surprised if this is the reason that Phil Hartman never divorced Brynn leading to his tragic death. These men I have written about are all well known. Many men are suffering in silence as victims of domestic violence. It is now known that women commit 50% of domestic violence. Given that men aren't likely to report women committing domestic violence against them, its safe to say that women commit more domestic violence than is reported. This is a real issue for millions of men including several famous men.
The title of this post is probably the title you would think would be on the top of the list of blog post titles I would never use. This will be explained shortly.
Saturday Night Live can have its ups and downs. Sometimes they're funny. Other times not so much. Sometimes they do a fairly good job, like with this skit where Kathie Lee Gifford gets beat up by the Black Eyed Peas. It's complete with that week's host, January Jones who you might know from this post, not knowing which camera was recording (to the point that her lack of knowing was recorded). (Unfortunately I can only find the Hulu upload and not a youtube upload):
Sometimes SNL really outdoes themselves with this skit called "Underground Festival". With this you will understand the title of this post. (Again I can't get a youtube upload. Only a Hulu one which might not work for those of you outside the US.)
This is actually a parody of the infomercial for the 2009 Gathering of the Juggalos. Be sure to watch the entire video to understand just how close a parody SNL did. (Might be a bit NSFW):
I don't know about anybody else, but I really want to see Gunt and Mrs. Potato Dick and get my free pitchfork.
There are many reasons I don't like having what is essentially two girlfriends. The moral issues are a big reason. The various practical reasons are also big. So far I have managed to make everything work. I have been lucky that I haven't gotten calls from one when I'm with the other. I have managed not to say the other's name when I'm with them.
The fact is I never expected this to happen. I never thought that I would have two women interested in me at the same time. After I first met them, I didn't pick one because I assumed that something would cause me to lose one or both so I didn't want to lose both. I thought getting as far as I did would be more difficult and take longer so by definition there would be only one woman at a time (assuming I could have even pulled that off).
I don't know which one I should dump. This weekend I have been thinking maybe I should just dump both. Not only is it an easy solution to the problem, but I having a real problem knowing that both Kristen and Rachel are lying to me. They are both lying a lot and insulting my intelligence by doing it.
Before going on I recommend everyone read this blog entry at The Better Beta about women lying since I am experiencing the same thing because this is commonplace. Some of the things Kristen and Rachel have lied to me about are:
How many guys they have been with. Both of them have told me things along the lines of "I have been with very few guys." Kristen is 35 years old. She has easily been with 2 gazillion guys. Rachel is only 28 so probably 1.5 gazillion. Both of them said this as reasons that they did not need STD testing. Both of them claimed that clearly I have been with way more women then they have been with men because I was pushing for STD testing.
This is the best sex of my life. Remember Kristen and Rachel aren't just saying that the sex is good. They are saying its the BEST they ever had. Both of them have been with gazillions of guys, and I, the guy who was a virgin three weeks ago, beat them all out by a wide margin. (Of course, they don't know I was a virgin a few weeks ago.) Kristen has told me she hopes the sex doesn't get any better because if it did she's worried that she would pass out from all the pleasure. Rachel told me that she has orgasmed each and every time we have had sex. Usually it takes her a while for that to happen, and it isn't consistent even then. Somehow my superior fucking has given her orgasms always each and every time. Both of them have done things that lend credence to what they say such has cooking me breakfast the morning after, but it doesn't change how unbelievable it all is. If I'm with Kristen and/or Rachel long enough I expect they will start telling me that they have multiple orgasms when I touch their shoulder.
I have never moved this fast with a guy before. This is more Kristen than Rachel somewhat. Remember that Kristen threw herself at me on our "first date". Kristen explained this later as that she has never wanted sex as much as she has wanted it with me. As a result she couldn't "control herself". Both of them said that waiting for their STD results to come back was "torture". From my experience, there isn't anything about me that should make a woman want me that much.
I'm willing to do things with you that I'm not willing to do with any other man. I guess my masculinity is so extreme again that Kristen and Rachel are willing to do things with me that they never would under any other circumstances. Yeah right.
What really gets me isn't the lies as much as how outlandish and unbelievable they are. I might have trouble believing that my first time at sex is really good, but its at least believable compared to the nonsense I'm being fed. I wish that Kristen and Rachel wouldn't insult my intelligence like that. I should dump them both for this, but as The Better Beta points out this behavior is common in women.
In my blogging career, I have done lots of things in a short time. I got Brent Spiner (Cmdr. Data from Star Trek: TNG) to call me an asshat. I got hundreds of women to say almost in unison that I had a small dick. I have even gotten hate mail claiming that I'm a reptilian alien and a member of the Illuminati/NWO at the highest echelon.
I'm a mens' rights blogger that has realized that technology is the key to defeating feminism and their allies. This blog exists because of that realization.
If you want to email me with anything, my email is in my profile.
