I am certain many of these responsible men would like to become fathers, but don't because its too dangerous. This is why I have talked about artificial wombs. With no mother involved the father can't lose his kids. However, artificial wombs don't exist yet, or do they?
I recently discovered that they do in a way. This comment on Novaseeker's blog talked about the Rotunda Clinic in India. What the Rotunda Clinic in India will do if you pay them a little less than $10,000 is take a man's sperm, put it together with an egg donor and surrogate mother in India to make a man a baby that is his. There's a video on their website about a gay couple who did just that. It's safe to say that the egg donor and surrogate mother being in India won't be able to access the American legal system so for a man, the baby is completely and totally his. Since the Rotunda Clinic will do this as long as you pay them, a man on his own could do this. If you want you can use an artificial womb today.
Imagine Father's Days when you never have to worry about losing your kids. This is why artificial wombs will be used by men who want kids in this way. Already men are raising their kids more. This is a natural progression.
1 comments:
Yup.
Women basically have "artificial wombs" now.....themselves.
If you are a woman, all you need do is sucker some chump to fuck you sans condom and you get your kid..............plus 25% of his income (sucker!). You don't have to let him see the kid, just "name" him as the father months later with a suprise phone call.
Artificial wombs would be a great "backup plan" for men in my opinon. If you dont meet the right gal by 35, have some sperm frozen, and get prepared finacially to have those two kids ON YOUR OWN at 40. You can still go to bars and hook up for sex just like single moms do, but you will be a single dad. Can you IMAGINE how mad women would get to be if this practice became legion?
But what could they do about it? They do it themselves all the time. Tons of unmarried women drop kids on society.
BTW----Years ago (this is over a decade back) I met a gal on the internet who wanted me to do her and her roomate without a condom. We exchanged pictures, all of that stuff. She had a webcam, got her clothes off............all of the modern courtship in its resplendent ugliness. It took me about two seconds to figure out these two were lesbians, and wanted a kid (and child support from yours truly). They were sure to ask about what I did for a living, where I worked, how long I'd lived where I was, all of that. They were sure to go on about how they had dreamed of having a threesome with a buff guy (I pumped alot of iron back then), et cetera et cetera. I told them I was going to stop on the way over to buy some condoms................and was told that "condoms irritate me and give me an infection, I must have some kind of allergy to the latex, but we are both on the pill, dont worry about it". I never showed up and blocked their phone number. I knew exactly what they were going to do. I was about to be played for a huge sucker.
Since we have rigged up the laws the way we have, women see men as potential financial resources and not as human beings. They dont see potential "dads", they see potential checks-in-the-mail.
There is little stigma to being a single mom now, so there should be hardly any stigma for being a single dad who doesn't take up any of the state's resources via welfare, and isn't asking child support from another working person. I think its a great idea (artificial wombs, surrogate mothers). Why should a man who would like to have a couple of kids be beholden to a nagging modern wife who can financially wreck him, when he just wanted a couple of kids of his own? I think it merely represents true equality.
Post a Comment